Comparison of Luminex xTAGW RVP Fast Assay and Real Time RT-PCR For the Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Adults With Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Artículo
![Thumbnail](/themes/Mirage2/images/cubierta.jpg)
Open/ Download
Publication date
2016Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Luchsinger Farías, Vivian
Cómo citar
Comparison of Luminex xTAGW RVP Fast Assay and Real Time RT-PCR For the Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Adults With Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Author
Abstract
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the
third cause of death worldwide. Viruses are
frequently detected in adult CAP. Highly sensitive
diagnostic techniques should be used due
to poor viral shedding. Different sampling methods
can affect viral detection, being necessary to
establish the optimal type of sample for identifying
respiratory viruses in adults. The detection
rates of respiratory viruses by Luminex xTAG1
RVP fast assay, real time RT-PCR (rtRT-PCR)
(Sacace1), and immunofluorescence assay (IFA)
in adult CAP were performed in nasopharyngeal
swabs (NPS) and aspirates (NPA) from 179
hospitalized adults. Positivity was 47.5% for
Luminex1, 42.5% for rtRT-PCR (P¼0.3), and
2.7% for IFA (2.7%) (P<0.0). The sensitivity,
specificity, and kappa coefficient of xTAG1 RVP
compared with rtRT-PCR were 84.2%, 79.6%,
and 0.62%, respectively. Luminex1 and rtRTPCR
detected 65 (58.0%) and 57 (50.9%) viruses
in 112 NPA and 35 (34.3%) and 31 (30.4%) in 102
NPS, respectively (P<0.01). xTAG1 RVP is appropriate
for detecting respiratory viruses in
CAP adults. Both molecular techniques yielded
better results with nasopharyngeal aspirate than
swabs.
General note
Artículo de publicación ISI
Patrocinador
Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnolog ıa
(FONDECYT); Grant number: No.1121025
Quote Item
Journal of Medical Virology 88:1173–1179 (2016)
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item: