Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorBarceló, Gonzalo 
Authordc.contributor.authorRíos, Juan Manuel 
Authordc.contributor.authorMaldonado, Karin 
Authordc.contributor.authorSabat Kirkwood, Alejandro Pablo 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2016-12-05T19:37:15Z
Available datedc.date.available2016-12-05T19:37:15Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2016
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJ Comp Physiol B (2016) 186:625–637es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1007/s00360-016-0974-4
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/141657
Abstractdc.description.abstractSeed-eating birds have a diet of high nutritional value; however, they must cope with plant secondary metabolites (PSM). We postulated that the detoxification capacity of birds is associated with a metabolic cost, given that the organs responsible for detoxification significantly contribute to energetic metabolism. We used an experimental approach to assess the effects of phenol-enriched diets on two passerines with different feeding habits: the omnivorous rufous-collared sparrow (Zonotrichia capensis) and the granivorous common diuca-finch (Diuca diuca). The birds were fed with one of three diets: control diet, supplemented with tannic acid, or supplemented with Opuntia ficus-indica phenolic extract (a common food of the sparrow but not the finch). After 5 weeks of exposure to the diets, we measured basal metabolic rates (BMR), energy intake, glucuronic acid output and digestive and kidney structure. In both species, detoxification capacity expressed as glucuronic acid output was higher in individuals consuming phenol-enriched diets compared to the control diet. However, whereas sparrows increase energy intake and intestinal mass when feeding on phenol-enriched diets, finches had lower intestinal mass and energy intake remains stable. Furthermore, sparrows had higher BMR on phenolenriched diets compared to the control group, whereas in the finches BMR remains unchanged. Interspecific differences in response to phenols intake may be determined by the dietary habits of these species. While both species can feed on moderate phenolic diets for 5 weeks, energy costs may differ due to different responses in food intake and organ structure to counteract the effects of PSM intake.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherSpringeres_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceJournal of Comparative Physiology Bes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectBirdses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectBMRes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectGut sizees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectKidneyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectOpuntia ficus-indicaes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPlant secondary compoundses_ES
Títulodc.titleEnergetic costs and implications of the intake of plant secondary metabolites on digestive and renal morphology in two austral passerineses_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorlajes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile