Testing for functional convergence of temperate rainforest tree assemblages in Chile and New Zealand
Author
dc.contributor.author
Lusk, Christopher H.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Jiménez-Castillo, Mylthon
Author
dc.contributor.author
Aragón, Raúl
Author
dc.contributor.author
Easdale, T. A.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Poorter, Lourens
Author
dc.contributor.author
Hinojosa Opazo, Luis
Author
dc.contributor.author
Mason, N. W. H.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2017-03-22T15:34:25Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2017-03-22T15:34:25Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2016
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
New Zealand Journal of Botany, Vol. 54, No. 2, 175–203
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1080/0028825X.2016.1143019
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/143206
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
An important tenet of biogeography and comparative ecology is that disjunct assemblages in similar physical environments are functionally more similar to each other than to assemblages from other environments. Temperate rainforests in South America, New Zealand and Australia share certain physiognomic similarities, but we are not aware of any statistical evidence that these disjunct plant assemblages share a distinctive suite of functional traits, or trait combinations. We compiled height, leaf, wood and reproductive traits from the 25 commonest arborescent species at Chilean and New Zealand sites matched for summer rainfall, summer maximum temperatures, and winter minimum temperatures. We then used multivariate tests of trait convergence. Tropical and subtropical assemblages served as out-groups. PERMANOVA showed convergence of trait centroids at the two temperate sites, where trees on average had denser wood and smaller leaves than trees at the (sub)tropical sites. Principal components analyses carried out separately on each assemblage showed that the Chilean and New Zealand assemblages were also the most similar pair in terms of trait relationships, although New Zealand also shared strong similarities with subtropical Argentina. The main axis of variation in both temperate assemblages ranged from small, short-lived understorey trees with soft leaves, to emergents with sclerophyllous leaves and fairly dense wood. However, the New Zealand assemblage was much richer in small trees with soft leaves than its Chilean counterpart; possible historical influences on this difference include conditions favouring radiation of small trees during the late Neogene in New Zealand, competition from Chusquea bamboos in Chile and the historical absence of browsing mammals from New Zealand. Environmental filtering has produced similar values of individual traits in Chile and New Zealand, but only partial convergence of functional trait combinations. As far as we know, this is the first study to statistically test whether disjunct tree assemblages on climatically matched sites are more functionally similar to each other than to assemblages from other environments