Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorBandera, Elisa 
Authordc.contributor.authorFay, Stephanie 
Authordc.contributor.authorGiovannucci, Edward 
Authordc.contributor.authorLeitzmann, Michael 
Authordc.contributor.authorMarklew, Rachel 
Authordc.contributor.authorMcTiernan, Anne 
Authordc.contributor.authorMullee, Amy 
Authordc.contributor.authorRomieu, Isabelle 
Authordc.contributor.authorThune, Inger 
Authordc.contributor.authorUauy Dagach-Imbarack, Ricardo 
Authordc.contributor.authorWiseman, Martin 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2017-03-29T16:34:36Z
Available datedc.date.available2017-03-29T16:34:36Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2016
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationInt. J. Cancer: 139, 2391–2397 (2016)es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1002/ijc.30248
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/143381
Abstractdc.description.abstractAnthropometric measures relating to body size, weight and composition are increasingly being associated with cancer risk and progression. Whilst practical in epidemiologic research, where population-level associations with disease are revealed, it is important to be aware that such measures are imperfect markers of the internal physiological processes that are the actual correlates of cancer development. Body mass index (BMI), the most commonly used marker for adiposity, may mask differences between lean and adipose tissue, or fat distribution, which varies across individuals, ethnicities, and stage in the lifespan. Other measures, such as weight gain in adulthood, waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio, contribute information on adipose tissue distribution and insulin sensitivity. Single anthropometric measures do not capture maturational events, including the presence of critical windows of susceptibility (i.e., age of menarche and menopause), which presents a challenge in epidemiologic work. Integration of experimental research on underlying dynamic genetic, hormonal, and other non-nutritional mechanisms is necessary for a confident conclusion of the overall evidence in cancer development and progression. This article discusses the challenges confronted in evaluating and interpreting the current evidence linking anthropometric factors and cancer risk as a basis for issuing recommendations for cancer preventiones_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipWorld Cancer Research Fund Internationales_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherWiley Blackwelles_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceInternational Journal of Canceres_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAdiposityes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAnthropometryes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectBody compositiones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectCanceres_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectHeightes_ES
Títulodc.titleThe use and interpretation of anthropometric measures in cancer epidemiology: A perspective from the world cancer research fund international continuous update projectes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorapces_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile