Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorBrignardello Petersen, Romina 
Authordc.contributor.authorGuyatt, Gordon H. 
Authordc.contributor.authorBuchbinder, Rachelle 
Authordc.contributor.authorPoolman, Rudolf W. 
Authordc.contributor.authorSchandelmaier, Stefan 
Authordc.contributor.authorChang, Yaping 
Authordc.contributor.authorSadeghirad, Behnam 
Authordc.contributor.authorEvaniew, Nathan 
Authordc.contributor.authorVandvik, Per O. 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-05-16T21:31:52Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-05-16T21:31:52Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2017
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationBMJ Open 2017;7: e016114es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.otherdoi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017- 016114
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/147834
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjective: To determine the effects and complications of arthroscopic surgery compared with conservative management strategies in patients with degenerative knee disease. Design: Systematic review. Main outcome measures: Pain, function, adverse events. Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar and Open Grey up to August 2016. Eligibility criteria: For effects, randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing arthroscopic surgery with a conservative management strategy (including sham surgery) in patients with degenerative knee disease. For complications, RCTs and observational studies. Review methods: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias for patient-important outcomes. A parallel guideline committee (BMJ Rapid Recommendations) provided input on the design and interpretation of the systematic review, including selection of patient-important outcomes. We used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty (quality) of the evidence. Results: We included 13 RCTs and 12 observational studies. With respect to pain, the review identified high-certainty evidence that knee arthroscopy results in a very small reduction in pain up to 3 months (mean difference = 5.4 on a 100-point scale, 95% CI 2.0 to 8.8) and very small or no pain reduction up to 2 years (mean difference = 3.1, 95% CI -0.2 to 6.4) when compared with conservative management. With respect to function, the review identified moderate-certainty evidence that knee arthroscopy results in a very small improvement in the short term (mean difference = 4.9 on a 100-point scale, 95% CI 1.5 to 8.4) and very small or no improved function up to 2 years (mean difference = 3.2, 95% CI -0.5 to 6.8). Alternative presentations of magnitude of effect, and associated sensitivity analyses, were consistent with the findings of the primary analysis. Low-quality evidence suggested a very low probability of serious complications after knee arthroscopy. Conclusions: Over the long term, patients who undergo knee arthroscopy versus those who receive conservative management strategies do not have important benefits in pain or function.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipAustralian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceBMJ Openes_ES
Títulodc.titleKnee arthroscopy versus conservative management in patients with degenerative knee disease: a systematic reviewes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadortjnes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile