Knee arthroscopy versus conservative management in patients with degenerative knee disease: a systematic review
Artículo
Open/ Download
Publication date
2017Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Brignardello Petersen, Romina
Cómo citar
Knee arthroscopy versus conservative management in patients with degenerative knee disease: a systematic review
Author
Abstract
Objective: To determine the effects and complications of arthroscopic surgery compared with conservative management strategies in patients with degenerative knee disease.
Design: Systematic review.
Main outcome measures: Pain, function, adverse events.
Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar and Open Grey up to August 2016.
Eligibility criteria: For effects, randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing arthroscopic surgery with a conservative management strategy (including sham surgery) in patients with degenerative knee disease. For complications, RCTs and observational studies.
Review methods: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias for patient-important outcomes. A parallel guideline committee (BMJ Rapid Recommendations) provided input on the design and interpretation of the systematic review, including selection of patient-important outcomes. We used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty (quality) of the evidence.
Results: We included 13 RCTs and 12 observational studies. With respect to pain, the review identified high-certainty evidence that knee arthroscopy results in a very small reduction in pain up to 3 months (mean difference = 5.4 on a 100-point scale, 95% CI 2.0 to 8.8) and very small or no pain reduction up to 2 years (mean difference = 3.1, 95% CI -0.2 to 6.4) when compared with conservative management. With respect to function, the review identified moderate-certainty evidence that knee arthroscopy results in a very small improvement in the short term (mean difference = 4.9 on a 100-point scale, 95% CI 1.5 to 8.4) and very small or no improved function up to 2 years (mean difference = 3.2, 95% CI -0.5 to 6.8). Alternative presentations of magnitude of effect, and associated sensitivity analyses, were consistent with the findings of the primary analysis. Low-quality evidence suggested a very low probability of serious complications after knee arthroscopy.
Conclusions: Over the long term, patients who undergo knee arthroscopy versus those who receive conservative management strategies do not have important benefits in pain or function.
Patrocinador
Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
Indexation
Artículo de publicación ISI
Identifier
URI: https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/147834
DOI: doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017- 016114
Quote Item
BMJ Open 2017;7: e016114
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item: