Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorZhou, Taotao 
Authordc.contributor.authorModarres, Mohammad 
Authordc.contributor.authorLópez Droguett, Enrique 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-07-24T23:17:31Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-07-24T23:17:31Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2018
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationReliability Engineering & System Safety Volumen: 171 Páginas: 34-47es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1016/j.ress.2017.11.015
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/150243
Abstractdc.description.abstractThis paper proposes an improved approach to external event probabilistic risk assessment for multi-unit sites. It considers unit-to-unit dependencies based on the integration of the copula notion, importance sampling, and parallel Monte Carlo simulation, including their implementation on standard PRA software tools. The multi-unit probabilistic risk assessment (MUPRA) approach and issues related to the current methods for seismic dependencies modeling are discussed. The seismic risk quantification is discussed in the context of two typical numerical schemes: the discretization-based scheme and simulation-based scheme. The issues related to the current discretization-based scheme are also highlighted. To address these issues and to quantify the seismic risk at the site level, an improved approach is developed to quantify the site-level fragilities. The approach is based on a hybrid scheme that involves the simulation-based method to account for the dependencies among the multi-unit structures, systems and components (SSCs) at the group level of dependent SSCs, and the discretization-based scheme. Finally, a case study is developed for the seismic-induced Small Loss of Coolant Accident (SLOCA) for a hypothetical nuclear plant site consisting of two identical advanced (GEN-III) reactor units. The results from this case study summarize the effects of correlation across multiple reactor units on the site-level core damage frequency (CDF). Three multi-unit CDF metrics (site, concurrent and marginal) were calculated for this case study. It is concluded that based on correlations between the SSCs, the total site CDF metric would be the most appropriate multi-unit CDF metric for seismic risk. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipUS NRC grant NRCHQ6014G0015es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherElsevier Science BVes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceReliability Engineering & System Safetyes_ES
Títulodc.titleAn improved multi-unit nuclear plant seismic probabilistic risk assessment approaches_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorrgfes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile