Impact of land-use change on biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Chilean temperate forests
Author
dc.contributor.author
Rodríguez Echeverry, James
Author
dc.contributor.author
Echeverría, Cristian
Author
dc.contributor.author
Oyarzún, Carlos
Author
dc.contributor.author
Morales Salinas, Luis
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2018-12-20T14:15:35Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2018-12-20T14:15:35Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2018
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Landscape Ecol (2018) 33:439–453
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
15729761
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
09212973
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1007/s10980-018-0612-5
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/155358
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Context: Land-use change impacts biodiversity and ecosystem services, which are intrinsically related. There is a serious lack of knowledge concerning on how land-use change affects this relationship at landscape level, where the greatest impacts have been reported. A proper knowledge of that relationship would provide crucial information for planning conservation strategies. The forest landscape of southern Chile, which includes Valdivian Temperate Forest, has been designated as a hotspot for biodiversity conservation. However, this landscape has been transformed by land-use change. Objective: We evaluated the impact of land-use change on the spatial patterns of the diversity of native forest habitat and the influence of these impacts on the provision of the ecosystem services water supply, erosion control, and organic matter accumulation from 1986 to 2011. Methods: The evaluation, at the landscape level, was carried out using satellite images, landscape metrics,
spatially explicit models and generalized linear
models. Results: We found that the area loss of
native forest habitat was 12%, the number patches of
native forest habitat increased more than 150% and
the Shannon diversity index decreased by 0.20. The
largest decrease in the provision of services was
recorded for erosion control (346%), and the smallest
for water supply (11%).
Conclusions The loss of provision of the ecosystem
services can be explained by the interaction between
the area loss, increase in the number patches and
diversity loss. We recommend that the conservation
planning strategies should consider the current landscape configuration, complemented with land-use planning