Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorPérez, Francisco J. 
Authordc.contributor.authorNoriega, Ximena 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-12-20T14:22:48Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-12-20T14:22:48Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2018
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationPlanta, Volumen 248, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 837-847
Identifierdc.identifier.issn14322048
Identifierdc.identifier.issn00320935
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1007/s00425-018-2941-7
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/155754
Abstractdc.description.abstract© 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. Main conclusion: Bud-break assays under forced growth conditions suggest that a drop in ABA content and an increase in sugars are common features in the sprouting of paradormant (PD) and endodormant (ED) grapevine buds. However, increases in cell division and in respiration are unique characteristics of the ED budding. In tropical and subtropical regions where the variations in day length and temperatures are minor throughout the year, the rupture of grapevine buds can be achieved during the current growing season given rise to a double-cropping system annually. However, it is unknown whether the breaking buds are in the paradormancy (PD) or endodormancy (ED) stage. In this study, we compared the breakage of PD and ED buds under conditions of forced growth. To do this, the expression of genes related to the metabolism of phytohormones and sugars, and of relevant physiological functions such as respiration and cell division
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Publisherdc.publisherSpringer Verlag
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourcePlanta
Keywordsdc.subjectBud break
Keywordsdc.subjectBud dormancy
Keywordsdc.subjectBud respiration
Keywordsdc.subjectCell cycle
Keywordsdc.subjectGrapevines
Keywordsdc.subjectPhytohormones
Keywordsdc.subjectVitis
Títulodc.titleSprouting of paradormant and endodormant grapevine buds under conditions of forced growth: similarities and differences
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorSCOPUS
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile