Growth hormone and treatment outcomes: Expert review of current clinical practice
Artículo
Open/ Download
Publication date
2011Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Cassorla Goluboff, Fernando
Cómo citar
Growth hormone and treatment outcomes: Expert review of current clinical practice
Author
Abstract
Although there are guidelines for treatment of short stature, open questions regarding optimal management of growth hormone therapy still exist. Experts attending six international meetings agree that successful therapy results in the patient attaining mid-parental height, and relies on correct diagnosis and early intervention. Experts advocate patient follow-up every 3-6 months, and that growth and adherence should be monitored at each visit. Growth response is variable, and an accepted definition of good/poor response is lacking. Combined with patient education and regular patient follow-up, a definition of treatment response could lead to improved treatment outcomes. Few experts use prediction models in clinical practice, but all agree that pharmacogenetics might improve prediction, enable early therapy modulation, and promote growth. Poor growth is often due to low adherence. Guidance on optimal management of growth hormone therapy is required, with focus on early diagnosis, dosing
Indexation
Artículo de publicación SCOPUS
Quote Item
Pediatric Endocrinology Reviews, Volumen 9, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 554-565
Collections