A Randomized Comparison between Interscalene and Small-Volume Supraclavicular Blocks for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
Artículo
Open/ Download
Publication date
2018Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Aliste Muñoz, Julián
Cómo citar
A Randomized Comparison between Interscalene and Small-Volume Supraclavicular Blocks for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
Author
Abstract
© 2018 by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Background and Objectives This randomized trial compared ultrasound (US)-guided interscalene block (ISB) and small-volume supraclavicular block (SCB) for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. We hypothesized that SCB would provide equivalent analgesia to ISB 30 minutes after surgery without the risk of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP). Methods All patients received an US-guided intermediate cervical plexus block. In the ISB group, US-guided ISB was performed with 20 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% and epinephrine 5 μg/mL. In the SCB group, US-guided SCB was carried out using 20 mL of the same local anesthetic agent: 3 and 17 mL were deposited at the "corner pocket" (ie, intersection of the first rib and subclavian artery) and posterolateral to the brachial plexus, respectively. A blinded investigator assessed ISBs and SCBs every 5 minutes until 30 minutes using a composite scale that encompassed the sensory function of the supra
Indexation
Artículo de publicación SCOPUS
Identifier
URI: https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/167567
DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000767
ISSN: 15328651
10987339
Quote Item
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Volumen 43, Issue 6, 2018, Pages 590-595
Collections