A systematic review of DURAL puncture epidural analgesia for labor
Artículo
Open/ Download
Publication date
2019Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Layera, Sebastián
Cómo citar
A systematic review of DURAL puncture epidural analgesia for labor
Abstract
© 2018 Study objective: This systematic review aimed to summarize the evidence derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing dural puncture epidural analgesia (DPEA) and conventional lumbar epidural analgesia (LEA) for women undergoing labor. Interventions: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to July 2018 in order to find RCTs published in the English language, which investigated DPEA in laboring women. Main results: Six RCTs were included in the final analysis. Their collective results remain ambiguous. Dural puncture with small (i.e., 26- or 27-gauge) spinal needles seems to confer either minimal benefits or improved analgesic quality and lower pain scores in the first 10 min. Dural puncture with 25-gauge spinal needles has been reported to provide higher success rate than conventional LEA in one trial; however two other studies could only agree on the fact that DPEA results in improved sacral blockade and fewer unilateral blocks compared to LEA
Indexation
Artículo de publicación SCOPUS
Identifier
URI: https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/167650
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.030
ISSN: 18734529
09528180
Quote Item
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, Volumen 53,
Collections