Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorPeppi, M. C. 
Authordc.contributor.authorKania Kuhl, Erika 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2019-05-29T14:01:12Z
Available datedc.date.available2019-05-29T14:01:12Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2017
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationActa Hortic. 1157. ISHS 2017
Identifierdc.identifier.issn05677572
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1157.3
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/169202
Abstractdc.description.abstractDuring the 2011-2012 season, a trial was conducted on mature 'Cabernet Sauvignon' vines in San Bernardo, Región Metropolitana, Chile, on a Mediterranean climate. The design was completely randomised blocks, with 12 replicates, and each vine corresponded to a block. The six-year old vines were trained to a bilateral cordon and pruned to 16 buds per vine. Randomly, one side was pruned leaving 4 spurs with 2 buds each; the other side was pruned to one 8-bud cane. The budbreak percentage, shoot growth, fruit yield and soluble solids, titratable acidity and pH of fruit were evaluated. On 100 berry skins, total anthocyanin content, and skin and seed total phenols and total tannins were measured by spectrophotometry, with anthocyanin and phenol composition measured by HPLC-DAD. Additionally, a fruit sensorial analysis was done at the time of harvest. The following winter, pruning weight was registered. Total shoot growth and average shoot length at the beginning of the season were higher on the spur-pruned treatment. Pruning weight was also superior on spur-pruned cordons. Although bud break was significantly higher on spur-pruned cordons, total fruit weight was the same between treatments. Cluster weight was statistically not different between spur and cane pruned cordons. Soluble solids, pH and TA were also similar between treatments. Total phenols, anthocyanins and tannins in the skins and seed phenols and tannins were not different between spur and cane treatments. Phenol composition showed no differences in skin or seeds from the fruits of each treatment. Sensorial analysis was similar for both treatments. The results for fruit parameters suggest that either pruning system can be used for optimal yield and fruit quality.
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Publisherdc.publisherInternational Society for Horticultural Science
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceActa Horticulturae
Keywordsdc.subjectBud position
Keywordsdc.subjectPhenolic compounds
Keywordsdc.subjectQuality
Títulodc.titleEffects of spur or cane pruning on fruit composition of 'Cabernet Sauvignon' grapes
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorlaj
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile