Urban ecosystem Services in Latin America: mismatch between global concepts and regional realities?
Author
dc.contributor.author
Dobbs, Cynnamon
Author
dc.contributor.author
Escobedo, Francisco J.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Clerici, Nicola
Author
dc.contributor.author
Barrera, Francisco de la
Author
dc.contributor.author
Eleuterio, Ana Alice
Author
dc.contributor.author
MacGregor-Fors, Ian
Author
dc.contributor.author
Reyes Paecke, Sonia
Author
dc.contributor.author
Vásquez, Alexis
Author
dc.contributor.author
Zea Camaño, Jorge Danilo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Hernández, H. Jaime
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-05-31T15:35:23Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-05-31T15:35:23Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2019
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Urban Ecosystems (2019) 22:173–187
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
15731642
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
10838155
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1007/s11252-018-0805-3
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/169733
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) is one of the most urbanized and biologically diverse regions in the world
but is often characterized by weak environmental governance and socioeconomic inequalities. Given large expanses
of intact biomes, a long history of pre-Colombian civilizations, and recent urbanization trends, the urban ecosystem
services (UES) concept has the potential to address issues of well-being for its citizens. We review relevant regional
and global literature and use expert-based knowledge to identify the state of the art of the UES concept as
applicable to green spaces in LAC and elucidate three overarching guidelines for management and future research
needs: 1. LAC cities can be socio-ecologically unique; 2. Drivers of UES in LAC can be different than in other
regions; and 3. Context and demand need to be accounted for when valuing UES. Overall, we show that research on
UES is mostly from the global north and rarely accounts for the diverse and complex socio-political and ecological
drivers of LAC’s urbanization processes. We find that, as in other regions, the biophysical context and land use
policies play a major role on UES provision. However, socioeconomic inequalities and weak governance are key
drivers in UES supply and demand in LAC. Context-specific information on how to promote, educate, and apply
UES is particularly important, not only in LAC, but in other regions where inequities, rapid urbanization, and
climate change effects are stressing socio-political and ecological systems and their adaptive capacities.
Standardized approaches from developed countries should be used to complement - not substitute – LAC context
specific approaches for studying and applying UES. We suggest that improved research funding and local governance
can also provide critical strategies, information and the means for more effective management, planning, and
equitable provision of UES.