Urban ecosystem Services in Latin America: mismatch between global concepts and regional realities?
Artículo
Open/ Download
Access note
Acceso Abierto
Publication date
2019Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Dobbs, Cynnamon
Cómo citar
Urban ecosystem Services in Latin America: mismatch between global concepts and regional realities?
Author
Abstract
Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) is one of the most urbanized and biologically diverse regions in the world
but is often characterized by weak environmental governance and socioeconomic inequalities. Given large expanses
of intact biomes, a long history of pre-Colombian civilizations, and recent urbanization trends, the urban ecosystem
services (UES) concept has the potential to address issues of well-being for its citizens. We review relevant regional
and global literature and use expert-based knowledge to identify the state of the art of the UES concept as
applicable to green spaces in LAC and elucidate three overarching guidelines for management and future research
needs: 1. LAC cities can be socio-ecologically unique; 2. Drivers of UES in LAC can be different than in other
regions; and 3. Context and demand need to be accounted for when valuing UES. Overall, we show that research on
UES is mostly from the global north and rarely accounts for the diverse and complex socio-political and ecological
drivers of LAC’s urbanization processes. We find that, as in other regions, the biophysical context and land use
policies play a major role on UES provision. However, socioeconomic inequalities and weak governance are key
drivers in UES supply and demand in LAC. Context-specific information on how to promote, educate, and apply
UES is particularly important, not only in LAC, but in other regions where inequities, rapid urbanization, and
climate change effects are stressing socio-political and ecological systems and their adaptive capacities.
Standardized approaches from developed countries should be used to complement - not substitute – LAC context
specific approaches for studying and applying UES. We suggest that improved research funding and local governance
can also provide critical strategies, information and the means for more effective management, planning, and
equitable provision of UES.
Indexation
Artículo de publicación SCOPUS
Identifier
URI: https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/169733
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-018-0805-3
ISSN: 15731642
10838155
Quote Item
Urban Ecosystems (2019) 22:173–187
Collections