One-year bleaching efficacy using two HP products with different pH: A double-blind randomized clinical trial
Artículo
Open/ Download
Publication date
2019Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Bersezio Miranda, Cristian
Cómo citar
One-year bleaching efficacy using two HP products with different pH: A double-blind randomized clinical trial
Author
Abstract
Objectives: This split-mouth, double-blind, randomized clinical trial evaluated the
1-year bleaching efficacy produced by two hydrogen peroxide gels with different pHs.
Materials and Methods: Twenty-eight patients were divided into two groups
corresponding to two different products: Pola Office (pH = 2.0/SDI) and Pola Office
Plus (pH = 7.0/SDI). The treatment was assessed during and after the bleaching procedure
up to 12 months post-treatment. The assessment consisted of two bleaching
scales shade guide units (ΔSGU) and spectrophotometric device (ΔE, ΔE00, and
Whiteness Index) of both maxillary quadrants. Results for ΔSGUs in both scales and
ΔE00 and Whiteness Index were compared using Mann Whitney test and ΔE measurements
through the t-Student test for paired samples in each evaluation time. The
color rebound (1- vs 12-month postbleaching data) was evaluated with Wilcoxon test
(alpha = .05).
Results: During the different times of evaluation, the color variation was similar for
both products (P > .05), both for subjective (ΔSGUs) and objective assessments (ΔE,
ΔE00, and Whiteness Index). Also, both products showed a slight rebound after
12-month postbleaching (P > .05).
Conclusions: Concerning the stability of color, in-office dental whitening with two
hydrogen peroxide gels of different pHs produced similar results, with no significant
of regression, for 12 months postwhitening.
Clinical Significance: Bleaching using a neutral (pH = 7.0) in-office gel demonstrated
similar stability and rebound effect than an acidic one (pH = 2.0).
Indexation
Artículo de publicación SCOPUS
Identifier
URI: https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/171507
DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12505
ISSN: 17088240
14964155
Quote Item
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31:493–499
Collections