Further understanding of the Ru-centered [2+2] cycloreversion/cycloaddition involved into the interconversion of ruthenacyclobutane using the Grubbs catalysts from a reaction force analysis
Author
dc.contributor.author
Paredes Gil, Katherine
Author
dc.contributor.author
Mendizábal Emaldía, Fernando
Author
dc.contributor.author
Jaque, Pablo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-10-22T03:11:15Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-10-22T03:11:15Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2019
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Journal of Molecular Modeling (2019) 25: 305
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
09485023
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1007/s00894-019-4150-0
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/171895
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
The chemical reactivity of the first- and second-generation Grubbs catalysts has always been a significant issue in olefin metathesis. In the present work, we study the [2+2] cycloreversion/cycloaddition and the alkylidene rotation involved into the interconversion of the ruthenacyclobutane intermediate, through the reaction force and reaction force constant analysis. It has been found that the structural contribution controls the barrier energy in the interconversion of ruthenacyclobutane via [2+2] cycloreversion/cycloaddition, which is slightly lower in the second generation of Grubbs catalysts while its electronic contribution is slightly higher, which unveils a major rigidity and donor/acceptor properties of the NHC. This finding explains a greater structural contribution in the rate constant. Moreover, on the basis of the reaction force constant, the process can be classified as “two-stage”-concerted reactions, noting a more asynchronous process when the first generation is used as a catalyst. Finally, a similar analysis into the alkylidene rotation was performed. It was determined that [2+2] cycloreversion and alkylidene rotations take place in a sequential manner, the energy barrier is again controlled by structural reorganization, and the pathway is less asynchronous.
Further understanding of the Ru-centered [2+2] cycloreversion/cycloaddition involved into the interconversion of ruthenacyclobutane using the Grubbs catalysts from a reaction force analysis