Antimicrobial resistance in water in Latin America and the Caribbean: Available research and gaps
Artículo
Open/ Download
Access note
Acceso Abierto
Publication date
2020Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Moreno Switt, Andrea I.
Cómo citar
Antimicrobial resistance in water in Latin America and the Caribbean: Available research and gaps
Abstract
Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a public health concern that has gained
increasing global awareness, and it is estimated that there will be 10 million deaths
annually by 2050. The importance of the role of the environment in disseminating
clinically relevant AMR is a concern. Although research on AMR in Latin America and
the Caribbean (LAC) has been conducted, these data have not been analyzed together
to better understand which areas in AMR have been more studied, and which require
more attention.
Objective: Determine the state of knowledge and identify the information gaps for AMR
in water in LAC through an exploratory review that identifies the scientific articles that
have addressed the topic.
Method: The process of selecting scientific articles from databases consisted of the
four phases of an exploratory review focusing on eight themes of interest.
Results: The selection process identified 289 studies that were published between
1973 and October 2017, and these studies were included in the analysis. Most of the
research was performed from 2008 to 2017. Brazil was the main contributor to the
study of AMR in the region while no research was identified in AMR in water in eight
of 18 of LAC countries. The most researched topics in water are phenotypic detection
of AMR (theme VIII), detection of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARG) (theme V), and
degradation of AMR (theme III). Limited research was identified on insects, agricultural
products, aquatic organisms, livestock, and wastewater other than hospital wastewater.
Research on emerging pests and diseases with a potential impact on the production of
AMR (theme VII), impact of the use of antimicrobials on agricultural production (theme
IV), and negative effects of AMR on wildlife (theme II) was scarce.
Conclusions: We suggest to focus research efforts and resources to study themes I,
II, IV, VI, and VII, for which there is little research in LAC, without hindering the valuable
research conducted on themes III, V, and VIII. The AMR environmental situation is mainly
driven by a few countries that are not representative of the LAC region, and therefore,
research is needed in other LAC countries besides Brazil.
Patrocinador
Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT)
CONICYT FONDECYT 11160116
FAO, Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean
ANID Millennium Science Initiative/Millennium Initiative for Collaborative Research on Bacterial Resistance, MICROB-R NCN17_081
Indexation
Artículo de publicación ISI Artículo de publicación SCOPUS
Quote Item
Frontiers in Veterinary Science August 2020 | Volume 7 | Article 546
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item: