Validación y generación de ecuaciones para estimar masa grasa corporal en adultos chilenos formuladas a partir de bioimpedanciometría, en un amplio rango de edad e índice de masa corporal
Author
dc.contributor.author
Schifferli, Ingrid
Author
dc.contributor.author
Orellana Cáceres, Juan José
Author
dc.contributor.author
Morales, Gladys
Author
dc.contributor.author
Inostroza, Jorge
Author
dc.contributor.author
Carrasco, Fernando
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2021-08-29T19:38:18Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2021-08-29T19:38:18Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2020
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Revista Médica Chile 2020; 148: 1435-1443
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
0034-9887
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/181615
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Background: Equations for the evaluation of fat-free mass (FFM) and fat
mass (FM) with Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) were formulated in
Caucasian populations. International recommendations suggest that population-
specific equations should be formulated. Aim: To validate an equation
previously formulated in Chileans adults and compare it to a new equation
generated on an independent sample. Material and Methods: In108 adult
volunteers aged 38.1±14.1 years (44% males), with a body mass index (BMI) of
25.1± 4.1 kg/m², body composition was measured by BIA (Bodystat) and dual
X-ray absorptiometry (DXA: Lunar Prodigy). Body composition estimated using
Schifferli equation and BIA were compared with DEXA, by the Bland-Altman
method and simple linear regression. Results: FFM and FM measured by DXA
were 45.2 ± 9.8 kg and 29.6 ± 11.7 % respectively. Resistance was 467.7 ± 76.3
ohm. Schifferli equation and BIA significantly overestimated FFM by 7.3 and
7.4 kg, respectively. The error was higher for high levels of FFM (slope β < 1,
p < 0.01). Both equations underestimated FM measured by DXA (averages of
7.5 and 7.8%, respectively, p < 0.01), without a differential bias for Schifferli
equation, but with a bias in low levels of FM measured with BIA (slope β < 1,
p < 0.01). Estimation biases could be eliminated using the regression coefficients.
Conclusions: Both equations behave similarly and have biases, although less
with Schifferli. Statistically correcting for biases, the new adjusted equations
provide clinically valid estimates of FFM and FM. Equations should not only
be population-specific, but also device-specific.
es_ES
Patrocinador
dc.description.sponsorship
Proyecto DIUFRO DI – 160092,
Universidad de la Frontera.
Validación y generación de ecuaciones para estimar masa grasa corporal en adultos chilenos formuladas a partir de bioimpedanciometría, en un amplio rango de edad e índice de masa corporal
es_ES
Title in another language
dc.title.alternative
Equations to estimate body composition using bioelectrical impedance in Chilean adults