Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorSchifferli, Ingrid 
Authordc.contributor.authorOrellana Cáceres, Juan José 
Authordc.contributor.authorMorales, Gladys 
Authordc.contributor.authorInostroza, Jorge 
Authordc.contributor.authorCarrasco, Fernando 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2021-08-29T19:38:18Z
Available datedc.date.available2021-08-29T19:38:18Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2020
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationRevista Médica Chile 2020; 148: 1435-1443es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.issn0034-9887
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/181615
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground: Equations for the evaluation of fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM) with Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) were formulated in Caucasian populations. International recommendations suggest that population- specific equations should be formulated. Aim: To validate an equation previously formulated in Chileans adults and compare it to a new equation generated on an independent sample. Material and Methods: In108 adult volunteers aged 38.1±14.1 years (44% males), with a body mass index (BMI) of 25.1± 4.1 kg/m², body composition was measured by BIA (Bodystat) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA: Lunar Prodigy). Body composition estimated using Schifferli equation and BIA were compared with DEXA, by the Bland-Altman method and simple linear regression. Results: FFM and FM measured by DXA were 45.2 ± 9.8 kg and 29.6 ± 11.7 % respectively. Resistance was 467.7 ± 76.3 ohm. Schifferli equation and BIA significantly overestimated FFM by 7.3 and 7.4 kg, respectively. The error was higher for high levels of FFM (slope β < 1, p < 0.01). Both equations underestimated FM measured by DXA (averages of 7.5 and 7.8%, respectively, p < 0.01), without a differential bias for Schifferli equation, but with a bias in low levels of FM measured with BIA (slope β < 1, p < 0.01). Estimation biases could be eliminated using the regression coefficients. Conclusions: Both equations behave similarly and have biases, although less with Schifferli. Statistically correcting for biases, the new adjusted equations provide clinically valid estimates of FFM and FM. Equations should not only be population-specific, but also device-specific.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipProyecto DIUFRO DI – 160092, Universidad de la Frontera.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoeses_ES
Publisherdc.publisherSociedad Médica de Santiago, Chilees_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceRevista Médica Chilees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectDual-energy X-Ray absorptiometryes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAdipose tissuees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectBody compositiones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectElectric impedancees_ES
Títulodc.titleValidación y generación de ecuaciones para estimar masa grasa corporal en adultos chilenos formuladas a partir de bioimpedanciometría, en un amplio rango de edad e índice de masa corporales_ES
Title in another languagedc.title.alternativeEquations to estimate body composition using bioelectrical impedance in Chilean adultses_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso Abierto
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcfres_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCIELOes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile