Validación y generación de ecuaciones para estimar masa grasa corporal en adultos chilenos formuladas a partir de bioimpedanciometría, en un amplio rango de edad e índice de masa corporal
Artículo
Open/ Download
Access note
Acceso Abierto
Publication date
2020Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Schifferli, Ingrid
Cómo citar
Validación y generación de ecuaciones para estimar masa grasa corporal en adultos chilenos formuladas a partir de bioimpedanciometría, en un amplio rango de edad e índice de masa corporal
Author
Abstract
Background: Equations for the evaluation of fat-free mass (FFM) and fat
mass (FM) with Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) were formulated in
Caucasian populations. International recommendations suggest that population-
specific equations should be formulated. Aim: To validate an equation
previously formulated in Chileans adults and compare it to a new equation
generated on an independent sample. Material and Methods: In108 adult
volunteers aged 38.1±14.1 years (44% males), with a body mass index (BMI) of
25.1± 4.1 kg/m², body composition was measured by BIA (Bodystat) and dual
X-ray absorptiometry (DXA: Lunar Prodigy). Body composition estimated using
Schifferli equation and BIA were compared with DEXA, by the Bland-Altman
method and simple linear regression. Results: FFM and FM measured by DXA
were 45.2 ± 9.8 kg and 29.6 ± 11.7 % respectively. Resistance was 467.7 ± 76.3
ohm. Schifferli equation and BIA significantly overestimated FFM by 7.3 and
7.4 kg, respectively. The error was higher for high levels of FFM (slope β < 1,
p < 0.01). Both equations underestimated FM measured by DXA (averages of
7.5 and 7.8%, respectively, p < 0.01), without a differential bias for Schifferli
equation, but with a bias in low levels of FM measured with BIA (slope β < 1,
p < 0.01). Estimation biases could be eliminated using the regression coefficients.
Conclusions: Both equations behave similarly and have biases, although less
with Schifferli. Statistically correcting for biases, the new adjusted equations
provide clinically valid estimates of FFM and FM. Equations should not only
be population-specific, but also device-specific.
Patrocinador
Proyecto DIUFRO DI – 160092,
Universidad de la Frontera.
Indexation
Artículo de publicación ISI Artículo de publicación SCIELO
Quote Item
Revista Médica Chile 2020; 148: 1435-1443
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item: