A multiyear systematic survey of the quality of reporting for randomised trials in dentistry, neurology and geriatrics published in journals of Spain and Latin America
Author
dc.contributor.author
Bachelet Norelli, Vivienne Christine
Author
dc.contributor.author
Navarrete, María S.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Barrera Riquelme, Constanza
Author
dc.contributor.author
Carrasco, Víctor A.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Dallaserra Albertini, Matías
Author
dc.contributor.author
Díaz, Rubén A.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ibarra, Álvaro A.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Lizana, Francisca J.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Meza Ducaud, Nicolás
Author
dc.contributor.author
Saavedra, Macarena G.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Tapia Davegno, Camila
Author
dc.contributor.author
Vergara, Alonso F.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Villanueva Maffei, Julio Alberto
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2021-10-25T20:16:25Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2021-10-25T20:16:25Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2021
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
BMC Med Res Methodol (2021) 21:153
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1186/s12874-021-01337-3
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/182381
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Background: The Iberoamerican Cochrane Network is currently developing an extensive project to identify Spanishlanguage
journals that publish original clinical research in Spain and Latin America. The project is called BADERI (Database
of Iberoamerican Essays and Journal) and feeds the research articles, mainly randomised clinical trials (RCTs), into
CENTRAL (Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Trials). This study aims to assess the quality of reporting
of RCTs published in Spanish and Latin American journals for three clinical fields and assess changes over time.
Methods: We did a systematic survey with time trend analysis of RCTs for dentistry, geriatrics, and neurology. These
fields were chosen for pragmatic reasons as they had not yet been completed in BADERI. After screening RCTs from
1990 to 2018 for randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials, we extracted data for 23 CONSORT items. The primary
outcome was the total score of the 23 predefined CONSORT 2010 items for each RCT (score range from 0 to 34). The
secondary outcome measure was the score for each one of these 23 items.
Results: A total of 392 articles from 1990 to 2018 were included as follows: dentistry (282), neurology (80), and geriatrics
(30). We found that the overall compliance score for the CONSORT items included in this study for all 392 RCTs
analysed was 12.6 on a scale with a maximum score of 34. With time, the quality of reporting improved slightly for
all RCTs. None of the articles achieved the complete individual CONSORT item compliance score. The lowest overall
compliance percentage was for item 10 (Randomisation implementation) and item 24 (Protocol registration), with a
dismal 1% compliance across all included RCTs, regardless of country.
Conclusions: CONSORT compliance is very poor in the 392 analysed RCTs. The impact of the CONSORT statement
on improving the completeness of RCT reporting in Latin America and Spain is not clear. Iberoamerican journals
should become more involved in endorsing and enforcing adherence to the CONSORT guidelines.
es_ES
Patrocinador
dc.description.sponsorship
DICYT Project 021901BN
es_ES
Lenguage
dc.language.iso
en
es_ES
Publisher
dc.publisher
BMC
es_ES
Type of license
dc.rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
A multiyear systematic survey of the quality of reporting for randomised trials in dentistry, neurology and geriatrics published in journals of Spain and Latin America