A multiyear systematic survey of the quality of reporting for randomised trials in dentistry, neurology and geriatrics published in journals of Spain and Latin America
Artículo
Open/ Download
Access note
Acceso abierto
Publication date
2021Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Bachelet Norelli, Vivienne Christine
Cómo citar
A multiyear systematic survey of the quality of reporting for randomised trials in dentistry, neurology and geriatrics published in journals of Spain and Latin America
Author
- Bachelet Norelli, Vivienne Christine;
- Navarrete, María S.;
- Barrera Riquelme, Constanza;
- Carrasco, Víctor A.;
- Dallaserra Albertini, Matías;
- Díaz, Rubén A.;
- Ibarra, Álvaro A.;
- Lizana, Francisca J.;
- Meza Ducaud, Nicolás;
- Saavedra, Macarena G.;
- Tapia Davegno, Camila;
- Vergara, Alonso F.;
- Villanueva Maffei, Julio Alberto;
Abstract
Background: The Iberoamerican Cochrane Network is currently developing an extensive project to identify Spanishlanguage
journals that publish original clinical research in Spain and Latin America. The project is called BADERI (Database
of Iberoamerican Essays and Journal) and feeds the research articles, mainly randomised clinical trials (RCTs), into
CENTRAL (Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Trials). This study aims to assess the quality of reporting
of RCTs published in Spanish and Latin American journals for three clinical fields and assess changes over time.
Methods: We did a systematic survey with time trend analysis of RCTs for dentistry, geriatrics, and neurology. These
fields were chosen for pragmatic reasons as they had not yet been completed in BADERI. After screening RCTs from
1990 to 2018 for randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials, we extracted data for 23 CONSORT items. The primary
outcome was the total score of the 23 predefined CONSORT 2010 items for each RCT (score range from 0 to 34). The
secondary outcome measure was the score for each one of these 23 items.
Results: A total of 392 articles from 1990 to 2018 were included as follows: dentistry (282), neurology (80), and geriatrics
(30). We found that the overall compliance score for the CONSORT items included in this study for all 392 RCTs
analysed was 12.6 on a scale with a maximum score of 34. With time, the quality of reporting improved slightly for
all RCTs. None of the articles achieved the complete individual CONSORT item compliance score. The lowest overall
compliance percentage was for item 10 (Randomisation implementation) and item 24 (Protocol registration), with a
dismal 1% compliance across all included RCTs, regardless of country.
Conclusions: CONSORT compliance is very poor in the 392 analysed RCTs. The impact of the CONSORT statement
on improving the completeness of RCT reporting in Latin America and Spain is not clear. Iberoamerican journals
should become more involved in endorsing and enforcing adherence to the CONSORT guidelines.
Patrocinador
DICYT Project 021901BN
Indexation
Artículo de publícación WoS Artículo de publicación SCOPUS
Quote Item
BMC Med Res Methodol (2021) 21:153
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item: