Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorNavarro Cuéllar, Carlos
Authordc.contributor.authorOchandiano Caicoya, Santiago
Authordc.contributor.authorNavarro Cuéllar, Ignacio
Authordc.contributor.authorValladares Pérez, Salvador
Authordc.contributor.authorFariña Sirandoni, Rodrigo Alejandro
Authordc.contributor.authorAntúnez Conde, Raúl
Authordc.contributor.authorDíez Montiel, Alberto
Authordc.contributor.authorSánchez Pérez, Arturo
Authordc.contributor.authorLópez López, Ana María
Authordc.contributor.authorNavarro Vila, car
Authordc.contributor.authorSalmerón Escobar, José Ignacio
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJ. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 101es_ES
Abstractdc.description.abstractDouble-barrel flap, vertical distraction and iliac crest graft are used to reconstruct the vertical height of the fibula. Twenty-four patients with fibula flap were reconstructed comparing these techniques (eight patients in each group) in terms of height of bone, bone resorption, implant success rate and the effects of radiotherapy. The increase in vertical bone with vertical distraction, double-barrel flap and iliac crest was 12.5 +/- 0.78 mm, 18.5 +/- 0.5 mm, and 17.75 +/- 0.6 mm, (p < 0.001). The perimplant bone resorption was 2.31 +/- 0.12 mm, 1.23 +/- 0.09 mm and 1.43 +/- 0.042 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. There were significant differences in vertical bone reconstruction and bone resorption between double-barrel flap and vertical distraction and between iliac crest and vertical distraction (p < 0.001). The study did not show significant differences in implant failure (p = 0.346). Radiotherapy did not affect vertical bone reconstruction (p = 0.125) or bone resorption (p = 0.237) but it showed higher implant failure in radiated patients (p = 0.015). The double-barrel flap and iliac crest graft showed better stability in the height of bone and less bone resorption and higher implant success rates compared with vertical distraction. Radiation therapy did not affect the vertical bone reconstruction but resulted in a higher implant failure.es_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
Link to Licensedc.rights.uri*
Sourcedc.sourceJournal of Clinical Medicinees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectFibula flapes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectVertical augmentationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectDouble-barrel flapes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectVertical distractiones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectIliac crest graftes_ES
Títulodc.titleVertical ridge augmentation of fibula flap in mandibular reconstruction: a comparison between vertical distraction, double-barrel flap and iliac crest graftes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dc.description.versiondc.description.versionVersión publicada - versión final del editores_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publícación WoSes_ES

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States