Vertical ridge augmentation of fibula flap in mandibular reconstruction: a comparison between vertical distraction, double-barrel flap and iliac crest graft
Artículo
Open/ Download
Access note
Acceso abierto
Publication date
2021Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Navarro Cuéllar, Carlos
Cómo citar
Vertical ridge augmentation of fibula flap in mandibular reconstruction: a comparison between vertical distraction, double-barrel flap and iliac crest graft
Author
Abstract
Double-barrel flap, vertical distraction and iliac crest graft are used to reconstruct the vertical height of the fibula. Twenty-four patients with fibula flap were reconstructed comparing these techniques (eight patients in each group) in terms of height of bone, bone resorption, implant success rate and the effects of radiotherapy. The increase in vertical bone with vertical distraction, double-barrel flap and iliac crest was 12.5 +/- 0.78 mm, 18.5 +/- 0.5 mm, and 17.75 +/- 0.6 mm, (p < 0.001). The perimplant bone resorption was 2.31 +/- 0.12 mm, 1.23 +/- 0.09 mm and 1.43 +/- 0.042 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. There were significant differences in vertical bone reconstruction and bone resorption between double-barrel flap and vertical distraction and between iliac crest and vertical distraction (p < 0.001). The study did not show significant differences in implant failure (p = 0.346). Radiotherapy did not affect vertical bone reconstruction (p = 0.125) or bone resorption (p = 0.237) but it showed higher implant failure in radiated patients (p = 0.015). The double-barrel flap and iliac crest graft showed better stability in the height of bone and less bone resorption and higher implant success rates compared with vertical distraction. Radiation therapy did not affect the vertical bone reconstruction but resulted in a higher implant failure.
Indexation
Artículo de publícación WoS
Quote Item
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 101
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item: