Early implant placement with or without alveolar ridge preservation in single tooth gaps renders similar esthetic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures: One-year results of a randomized clinical trial
Author
dc.contributor.author
Jonker, Brend P.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Strauss Avendaño, Franz Josef
Author
dc.contributor.author
Naenni, Nadja
Author
dc.contributor.author
Jung, Ronald E.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Wolvius, Eppo B.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Pijpe, Justin
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2021-12-07T18:32:20Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2021-12-07T18:32:20Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2021
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Clin Oral Impl Res. 2021;32:1041–1051.
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1111/clr.13796
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/183109
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Objectives: To test whether early implant placement with alveolar ridge preservation
(ARP) results in different esthetic, clinical and patient-reported
outcome measures
(PROMs) compared with early implant placement without ARP.
Material and methods: Seventy-five
patients requiring single tooth extraction in the
anterior maxilla were recruited. Following tooth extraction, the patients were randomly
allocated to three groups: (a) ARP using demineralized bovine bone mineral
containing 10% collagen (DBBM-C)
covered by a collagen matrix (CM) (n = 25), (b)
ARP using DBBM-C
covered with a palatal graft (PG) (n = 25) and (c) spontaneous
healing (control) (n = 25). Eight weeks after tooth extraction, a CBCT was taken and
early implant placement was performed in all patients. Esthetic, clinical and PROMs
were evaluated one year post-loading.
Results: A total of 70 patients were available for re-examination
at one year post-loading.
The median mid-facial
mucosal margin change amounted to −0.02 mm (IQR
−0.27–0.46)
in the CM group, −0.13 mm (IQR −0.44–0.25)
in the PG group and
−0.14 mm (IQR −0.29–0.07)
in the control group, with no significant differences between
the groups. Mean PES scores amounted to 7.0 ± 1.4 in the CM group, 7.1 ± 1.5
in the PG group and 7.3 ± 1.7 in the control group without significant differences
between the groups. Plaque, bleeding on probing and probing depth did not differ
between treatment groups. PROMs in general revealed no significant differences between
the groups.
Conclusion: Early implant placement with ARP using either a collagen matrix or a
palatal graft rendered similar esthetic, clinical and PROMs to early implant placement
without ARP. When a failing tooth can be replaced with an implant within 2 months
after tooth extraction, the added value of ARP might be clinically negligible.
es_ES
Patrocinador
dc.description.sponsorship
Straumann AG
Geistlich Pharma AG
es_ES
Lenguage
dc.language.iso
en
es_ES
Publisher
dc.publisher
Wiley
es_ES
Type of license
dc.rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Early implant placement with or without alveolar ridge preservation in single tooth gaps renders similar esthetic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures: One-year results of a randomized clinical trial