Early implant placement with or without alveolar ridge preservation in single tooth gaps renders similar esthetic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures: One-year results of a randomized clinical trial
Artículo
Open/ Download
Access note
Acceso abierto
Publication date
2021Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Jonker, Brend P.
Cómo citar
Early implant placement with or without alveolar ridge preservation in single tooth gaps renders similar esthetic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures: One-year results of a randomized clinical trial
Author
Abstract
Objectives: To test whether early implant placement with alveolar ridge preservation
(ARP) results in different esthetic, clinical and patient-reported
outcome measures
(PROMs) compared with early implant placement without ARP.
Material and methods: Seventy-five
patients requiring single tooth extraction in the
anterior maxilla were recruited. Following tooth extraction, the patients were randomly
allocated to three groups: (a) ARP using demineralized bovine bone mineral
containing 10% collagen (DBBM-C)
covered by a collagen matrix (CM) (n = 25), (b)
ARP using DBBM-C
covered with a palatal graft (PG) (n = 25) and (c) spontaneous
healing (control) (n = 25). Eight weeks after tooth extraction, a CBCT was taken and
early implant placement was performed in all patients. Esthetic, clinical and PROMs
were evaluated one year post-loading.
Results: A total of 70 patients were available for re-examination
at one year post-loading.
The median mid-facial
mucosal margin change amounted to −0.02 mm (IQR
−0.27–0.46)
in the CM group, −0.13 mm (IQR −0.44–0.25)
in the PG group and
−0.14 mm (IQR −0.29–0.07)
in the control group, with no significant differences between
the groups. Mean PES scores amounted to 7.0 ± 1.4 in the CM group, 7.1 ± 1.5
in the PG group and 7.3 ± 1.7 in the control group without significant differences
between the groups. Plaque, bleeding on probing and probing depth did not differ
between treatment groups. PROMs in general revealed no significant differences between
the groups.
Conclusion: Early implant placement with ARP using either a collagen matrix or a
palatal graft rendered similar esthetic, clinical and PROMs to early implant placement
without ARP. When a failing tooth can be replaced with an implant within 2 months
after tooth extraction, the added value of ARP might be clinically negligible.
Patrocinador
Straumann AG
Geistlich Pharma AG
Indexation
Artículo de publícación WoS Artículo de publicación SCOPUS
Quote Item
Clin Oral Impl Res. 2021;32:1041–1051.
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item: