Consensus on treatment and follow-up for biochemical recurrence in castration-sensitive prostate cancer: A report from the first global prostate cancer consensus conference for developing countries
Author
dc.contributor.author
Monteiro, Fernando S. M.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Schutz, Fabio A.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Morbeck P., Igor A.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Bastos, Diogo A.
Author
dc.contributor.author
De Padua, Fernando V.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Costa, Leonardo A. G. A.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Maia, Manuel C.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Rinck Jr., José A.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Zequi, Stenio de Cassio
Author
dc.contributor.author
Da Trindade, Karine M.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Alfer Jr., Wladimir
Author
dc.contributor.author
Nahas, William C.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Dos Santos, Lucas V.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ferrigno, Robson
Author
dc.contributor.author
Da Rosa, Diogo A. R.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Sade, Juan P.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Orlandi Jorquera, Francisco Javier
Author
dc.contributor.author
De Oliveira, Fernando N. G.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Soares, Andrey
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2022-01-11T14:59:35Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2022-01-11T14:59:35Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2021
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
JCO Global Oncol 7:538-544 (2021)
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10. 1200/GO.20.00508
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/183662
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
PURPOSE To present a summary of the treatment and follow-up recommendations for the biochemical recurrence
in castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PCa) acquired through a questionnaire administered to 99 PCa
experts from developing countries during the Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference for Developing Countries.
METHODS A total of 27 questions were identified as related to this topic from more than 300 questions. The
clinician’s responses were tallied and presented in a percentage format. Topics included the use of imaging for
staging biochemical recurrence, treatment recommendations for three different clinical scenarios, the field of
radiation recommended, and follow-up. Each question had 5-7 relevant response options, including “abstain”
and/or “unqualified to answer,” and investigated not only recommendations but also if a limitation in resources
would change the recommendation.
RESULTS For most questions, a clear majority (. 50%) of clinicians agreed on a recommended treatment for
imaging, treatment scenarios, and follow-up, although only a few topics reached a consensus . 75%. Limited
resources did affect several areas of treatment, although in many cases, they reinforced more stringent criteria
for treatment such as prostate-specific antigen values . 0.2 ng/mL and STAMPEDE inclusion criteria as a basis
for recommending treatment.
CONCLUSION A majority of clinicians working in developing countries with limited resources use similar cutoff
points and selection criteria to manage patients treated for biochemically recurrent castration-sensitive PCa.
es_ES
Lenguage
dc.language.iso
en
es_ES
Publisher
dc.publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
es_ES
Type of license
dc.rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Consensus on treatment and follow-up for biochemical recurrence in castration-sensitive prostate cancer: A report from the first global prostate cancer consensus conference for developing countries