Consensus on treatment and follow-up for biochemical recurrence in castration-sensitive prostate cancer: A report from the first global prostate cancer consensus conference for developing countries
Artículo
Open/ Download
Access note
Acceso abierto
Publication date
2021Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Monteiro, Fernando S. M.
Cómo citar
Consensus on treatment and follow-up for biochemical recurrence in castration-sensitive prostate cancer: A report from the first global prostate cancer consensus conference for developing countries
Author
- Monteiro, Fernando S. M.;
- Schutz, Fabio A.;
- Morbeck P., Igor A.;
- Bastos, Diogo A.;
- De Padua, Fernando V.;
- Costa, Leonardo A. G. A.;
- Maia, Manuel C.;
- Rinck Jr., José A.;
- Zequi, Stenio de Cassio;
- Da Trindade, Karine M.;
- Alfer Jr., Wladimir;
- Nahas, William C.;
- Dos Santos, Lucas V.;
- Ferrigno, Robson;
- Da Rosa, Diogo A. R.;
- Sade, Juan P.;
- Orlandi Jorquera, Francisco Javier;
- De Oliveira, Fernando N. G.;
- Soares, Andrey;
Abstract
PURPOSE To present a summary of the treatment and follow-up recommendations for the biochemical recurrence
in castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PCa) acquired through a questionnaire administered to 99 PCa
experts from developing countries during the Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference for Developing Countries.
METHODS A total of 27 questions were identified as related to this topic from more than 300 questions. The
clinician’s responses were tallied and presented in a percentage format. Topics included the use of imaging for
staging biochemical recurrence, treatment recommendations for three different clinical scenarios, the field of
radiation recommended, and follow-up. Each question had 5-7 relevant response options, including “abstain”
and/or “unqualified to answer,” and investigated not only recommendations but also if a limitation in resources
would change the recommendation.
RESULTS For most questions, a clear majority (. 50%) of clinicians agreed on a recommended treatment for
imaging, treatment scenarios, and follow-up, although only a few topics reached a consensus . 75%. Limited
resources did affect several areas of treatment, although in many cases, they reinforced more stringent criteria
for treatment such as prostate-specific antigen values . 0.2 ng/mL and STAMPEDE inclusion criteria as a basis
for recommending treatment.
CONCLUSION A majority of clinicians working in developing countries with limited resources use similar cutoff
points and selection criteria to manage patients treated for biochemically recurrent castration-sensitive PCa.
Indexation
Artículo de publícación WoS
Quote Item
JCO Global Oncol 7:538-544 (2021)
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item: