Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorSalazar Guerrero, Osvaldo 
Authordc.contributor.authorVargas, Juan es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorNájera de Ferrari, Francisco es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorSeguel Seguel, Oscar es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorCasanova Pinto, Manuel es_CL
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2014-12-22T18:07:40Z
Available datedc.date.available2014-12-22T18:07:40Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2014
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationAgricultural Water Management Volume 146, December 2014, Pages 218–227en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.otherdoi:10.1016/j.agwat.2014.08.014
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/120257
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación SCOPUSen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractThe demand for foods in central Chile is increasing and arable land is expanding rapidly onto floodplain soils, which are being cleared for maize cultivation. After harvest, a significant amount of residual nitrogen (N) may be still present in the soil in autumn–winter, when a high risk of nitrate leaching (NL) is expected due to occasional flooding events. Determining nitrate (NO3−) movement through the vadose zone is essential for studying the impact of agricultural practices on surface water quality. This study focused on understanding the processes of NO3− leaching in a floodplain environment and compared the effectiveness of four different methods: soil coring (T0), an observation well (T1), ceramic suction cup lysimeters (T2) and a capillary lysimeter (FullStop™ wetting front detector) (T3) for monitoring NL using an infiltration cylinder to simulate the conditions generated during flush flooding events during autumn–winter season in a typical coarse-textured alluvial floodplain soil. The comparison showed that T0 and T3 can be used for monitoring NL during flush flooding events during autumn–winter season in stratified coarse-textured floodplain soils, whereas T1 and T2 are not appropriate for these site conditions. A correlation was found between NO3 and soluble salt (Cl− concentration and EC) only in the first measurements after the dry summer period. The results of this study suggest that most of the surplus N could be leached by excessive irrigation during the crop growing season (spring–summer), while a lower amount of residual N may still be present in the soil in autumn–winter available to be lost by NL during flush flooding events. Overall the two monitored flushing events could have leached around 6% of the total NO3–N load. There was no significant effect of sampler devices on saturated hydraulic conductivity.en_US
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Soil and Engineering at the University of Chile FONDECYTen_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherElsevieren_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Keywordsdc.subjectSampling methodsen_US
Títulodc.titleMonitoring of nitrate leaching during flush flooding events in a coarse-textured floodplain soilen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile