Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorNeira Ramírez, Víctor 
Authordc.contributor.authorAllerson, Matt 
Authordc.contributor.authorCorzo, Cesar 
Authordc.contributor.authorCulhane, Marie 
Authordc.contributor.authorRendahl, Aaron 
Authordc.contributor.authorTorremorell, Montserrat 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-09-27T18:24:46Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-09-27T18:24:46Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2018-05-21
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE 13(5): e0197600es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1371/journal.pone.0197600
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/151795
Abstractdc.description.abstractThe 2009 influenza pandemic, the variant H3N2v viruses in agricultural fairs and the zoonotic poultry H5N9 infections in China have highlighted the constant threat that influenza A viruses (IAV) present to people and animals. In this study we evaluated the effect of IAV vaccination on aerosol shedding in pigs housed in warm environmental conditions. Thirty-six, three-week old weaned pigs were obtained from an IAV negative herd and were randomly allocated to one of 4 groups: 1) a homologous vaccine group, 2) a heterologous multivalent vaccine group, 3) a heterologous monovalent group and, 4) a non-vaccinated group. After vaccination pigs were challenged with the triple reassortant A/Sw/IA/00239/04 H1N1 virus. Environmental temperature and relative humidity were recorded throughout the study. Nasal swabs, oral fluids and air samples were collected daily. All samples were tested by RRT-PCR and virus isolation was attempted on positive samples. Average temperature and relative humidity throughout the study were 27 degrees C (80 degrees F) and 53%, respectively. A significantly higher proportion of infected pigs was detected in the non-vaccinated than in the vaccinated group. Lower levels of nasal virus shedding were found in vaccinated groups compared to non-vaccinated group and IAV was not detected in air samples of any of the vaccinated groups. In contrast, positive air samples were detected in the non-vaccinated group at 1, 2 and 3 days post infection although the overall levels were considered low most likely due to the elevated environmental temperature. In conclusion, both the decrease in shedding and the increase in environmental temperature may have contributed to the inability to detect airborne IAV in vaccinated pigs.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipNational Pork Board 11-038es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherPublic library sciencees_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourcePlos Onees_ES
Keywordsdc.subject2011-2012 H3N2Ves_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectUnited-Stateses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectRisk-factorses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectSwinees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectEfficacyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectH1N1es_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectTransmissiones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectTemperaturees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectSurveillancees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectInfectionses_ES
Títulodc.titleDetection of influenza A virus in aerosols of vaccinated and non-vaccinated pigs in a warm environmentes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorrgfes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile