Show simple item record

Authors seldom report the most patient-important outcomes and absolute effect measures in systematic review abstracts

Authordc.contributor.authorAgarwal, Arnav 
Authordc.contributor.authorJohnston, Bradley C. 
Authordc.contributor.authorVernooij, Robin W.M. 
Authordc.contributor.authorCarrasco Labra, Alonso 
Authordc.contributor.authorBrignardello Petersen, Romina 
Authordc.contributor.authorNeumann, Ignacio 
Authordc.contributor.authorAkl, Elie A 
Authordc.contributor.authorSun, Xin 
Authordc.contributor.authorBriel, Matthias 
Authordc.contributor.authorBusse, Jason W. 
Authordc.contributor.authorEbrahim, Shanil 
Authordc.contributor.authorGranados, Carlos E. 
Authordc.contributor.authorIorio, Alfonso 
Authordc.contributor.authorIrfan, Affan 
Authordc.contributor.authorMartínez G 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-12-20T15:25:11Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-12-20T15:25:11Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2017
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, Volumen 81,
Identifierdc.identifier.issn18785921
Identifierdc.identifier.issn08954356
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.004
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/159183
Abstractdc.description.abstract© 2016 Elsevier Inc. Objectives Explicit reporting of absolute measures is important to ensure treatment effects are correctly interpreted. We examined the extent to which authors report absolute effects for patient-important outcomes in abstracts of systematic review (SR). Study Design and Setting We searched OVID MEDLINE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify eligible SRs published in the year 2010. Citations were stratified into Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews, with repeated random sampling in a 1:1 ratio. Paired reviewers screened articles and recorded abstract characteristics, including reporting of effect measures for the most patient-important outcomes of benefit and harm. Results We included 96 Cochrane and 94 non-Cochrane reviews. About 117 (77.5%) relative measures were reported in abstracts for outcomes of benefit, whereas only 34 (22.5%) absolute measures were reported. Similarly, for outcomes of harm, 41 (87.2%) relative measures were provided in abstrac
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Publisherdc.publisherElsevier USA
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Keywordsdc.subjectAbsolute measures
Keywordsdc.subjectAbstract reporting
Keywordsdc.subjectCochrane reviews
Keywordsdc.subjectExplicit reporting
Keywordsdc.subjectNon-Cochrane reviews
Keywordsdc.subjectPatient-important outcomes
Títulodc.titleAuthors seldom report the most patient-important outcomes and absolute effect measures in systematic review abstracts
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorSCOPUS
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile