Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorPavez Muñoz, Erika Isabel
Authordc.contributor.authorFernández Sanhueza, Bastián Ignacio
Authordc.contributor.authorUrzúa Encina, Constanza Andrea
Authordc.contributor.authorGalarce, Nicolás
Authordc.contributor.authorAlegría Morán, Raúl Alejandro
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2022-06-17T17:13:52Z
Available datedc.date.available2022-06-17T17:13:52Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2021
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationInt. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10730es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.3390/ijerph182010730
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/186130
Abstractdc.description.abstractIn the Metropolitana region of Chile there are 3836 backyard production systems (BPS), characterized as small-scale systems. They act as a source of zoonotic pathogens, such as Salmonella enterica and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), whose prevalence in BPS has not been fully described. The objective of this study was to determine the positivity for both agents in BPS and to establish the risk factors related to their presence. In each BPS, an epidemiological survey was undertaken, and stool samples were collected to detect these pathogens via bacteriological culture and conventional PCR techniques. Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression models were applied to establish the risk factors associated with their presence. BPS positivity rates of 11.76% for STEC and 4.7% for S. enterica were observed. The systems showed poor welfare standards and a lack of biosecurity measures. The risk factor analysis concluded that the Gini–Simpson index (p = 0.030; OR = 1.717) and the presence of neighboring intensive poultry or swine production systems (p = 0.019; OR = 20.645) act as factors that increased the risk of positivity with respect to STEC. In the case of S. enterica, exchanging embryonated eggs (p = 0.021; OR = 39) and the presence of debeaked chickens (p = 0.001; OR = 156) were determined as factors that increased the risk of positivity for this agent. For positivity with respect to both pathogens, the Gini–Simpson index (p = 0.030; OR = 1.544) and being INDAP/PRODESAL users (p = 0.023; OR = 15.026) were determined as factors that increased the risk, whereas the type of confinement (p = 0.002; OR = 0.019) decreased it. Epidemiological surveillance of these neglected populations is lacking, highlighting the fact that STEC and S. enterica maintenance on BPS represents a potential threat to public health.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipComision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT) CONICYT FONDECYT 11180476es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherMDPIes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
Sourcedc.sourceInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectBackyard production systemses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectSTECes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectSalmonella entericaes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectRisk factorses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPublic healthes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectOne healthes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectZoonosises_ES
Títulodc.titleRisk factors for positivity to shiga toxin-producing escherichia coli and salmonella enterica in backyard production systems animals from Metropolitana Region, Chile: A threat to public health?es_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dc.description.versiondc.description.versionVersión publicada - versión final del editores_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcfres_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publícación WoSes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States