The argumentative and the evaluative structures in two discourse types
Professor Advisor
dc.contributor.advisor
Zenteno Bustamante, Carlos
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Franco Gallardo, Elizabeth
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Guzmán Von-Chrismar, Claudia
es_CL
Staff editor
dc.contributor.editor
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades
es_CL
Staff editor
dc.contributor.editor
Departamento de Lingüística
es_CL
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2012-09-12T19:16:16Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2012-09-12T19:16:16Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2005
es_CL
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/110208
General note
dc.description
Informe de Seminario para optar al grado de Licenciado en Lengua y Literatura Inglesa.
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
In this research study, we have attempted to carry out the analysis of a series of linguistic texts which can be regarded as being typical representatives of the argumentative and evaluative discourse types characteristically found in the mass media. In a broad sense, the present study aims to examine the operation of the evaluative and the argumentative component in two text classes: newspaper editorials and art reviews. In order to achieve this objective, six editorials and six reviews (four film and two play reviews), selected from different on-line newspapers and art specialist websites, were analysed along the lines dictated by the descriptive models chosen for the study. In a narrow sense, it attempts to examine whether argumentation is at the service of evaluation or viceversa, as well as any possible interdependence between them.