Environmental assessment of mercury pollution in urban tailings from gold mining
Artículo
![Thumbnail](/themes/Mirage2/images/cubierta.jpg)
Open/ Download
Publication date
2013Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Leiva Guzmán, Manuel
Cómo citar
Environmental assessment of mercury pollution in urban tailings from gold mining
Author
Abstract
It is well-known that small-scale artisanal mining is a source of mercury emissions into the environment, mainly from the use of rudimentary technologies that use mercury amalgamation in the extraction process. Mines near Andacollo, which is located in the Coquimbo region of Chile, use primitive methods to mine gold and copper. In this study, we determined the mercury content of gold mining wastes from Andacollo. At each site, we randomly sampled the soil at the surface and at a depth of 2 m following the ISO 10381 guidelines. Mercury analysis was performed with a direct mercury analyzer. At least one site was contaminated at a mercury concentration of 13.6±1.4 mg kg−1, which was above the international recommendations that were set by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment's soil quality guidelines (CA-SQG) and the Dutch guidelines (NL-RIVM). At least four of the fourteen sites in this study were within the control and tolerance levels of these recommendations. Better characterization of these sites is required to establish whether they represent a risk to the local community. Based on the US-EPA recommendations, which have a higher tolerance limit, none of the fourteen sites should pose a risk to humans.
General note
Artículo de publicación ISI
Patrocinador
The financial support of the Chilean Ministry of the Environment (Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, MMA) is gratefully acknowledged. This research was conducted under the Ministerio del Medio Ambiente—Centro Nacional del Medio Ambiente 2008–2010 and Centro de Ciencias Ambientales—Centro Nacional del Medio Ambiente agreements.
Identifier
URI: https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/119710
DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.12.026
Quote Item
Ecotoxicology andEnvironmentalSafety90(2013)167–173
Collections