Land Use Influences Carbon Fluxes in Northern Kazakhstan
Artículo
Open/ Download
Publication date
2010-01Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Pérez Quezada, Jorge
Cómo citar
Land Use Influences Carbon Fluxes in Northern Kazakhstan
Author
Abstract
A mobile, closed-chamber system (CC) was used to measure carbon and water fluxes on four land-use types common in the
Kazakh steppe ecoregion. Land uses represented crop (wheat or barley, WB), abandoned land (AL), crested wheatgrass (CW), and
virgin land (VL). Measurements were conducted during the growing season of 2002 in northern Kazakhstan at three locations
(blocks) 15–20 km apart. The CC allowed the measurement of the carbon flux components of net ecosystem exchange (NEE),
ecosystem respiration (RE) and soil respiration (RS), together with evapotranspiration (ET). Nonlinear regression analyses were
used to model gross primary production (GPP) and ET as a function of photosynthetically active radiation (Q); RE and RS were
modeled based on air (Tair) and soil (Ts) temperature, respectively. GPP, RE, RS, and ET were estimated for the entire year with the
use of continuous 20-min means of Q, Tair, and Ts. Annual NEE indicated that AL gained 536 g CO2 ?m22, WB lost 2191 g
CO2 ?m22, CW was near equilibrium (214 g CO2 ?m22), and VL exhibited considerable carbon accumulation (153 g
CO2 ?m22). The lower GPP values of the land-use types dominated by native species (CWand VL) compared to WB and AL were
compensated by positive NEE values that were maintained during a longer growing season. As expected, VL and CW allocated a
larger proportion of their carbon assimilates belowground. Non–growing-season RE accounted for about 19% of annual RE in all
land-use types. The results of this landscape-level study suggest that carbon lost by cultivation of VLs is partially being restored
when fields are left uncultivated, and that VLs are net sinks of carbon. Estimations of carbon balances have important management
implications, such as estimation of ecosystem productivity and carbon credit certification.
Patrocinador
Research was funded by the Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support Program, Grant PCE-G-00-98-00036-00 from the US Agency for International Development. J.P.-Q. was funded by
scholarships from the University of California–Davis.
Quote Item
Rangeland Ecol Manage 63:82–93, January 2010
Collections