Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorCarrasco, F. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorRojas, P. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorRuz, Manuel es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorRebolledo Acevedo, Annabella es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorMizón, Claudio es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorCodoceo, Juana es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorInostroza Escobar, Jorge es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorPapapietro Vallejo, Karin es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorCsendes Juhasz, Attilaes_CL
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2008-05-14T14:08:07Z
Available datedc.date.available2008-05-14T14:08:07Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2007es_CL
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationNUTRICION HOSPITALARIA Vol. 22 JUL-AUG 2007 4 410-416es_CL
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/127505
General notedc.descriptionPublicación ISIes_CL
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjective: To compare measured resting energy expenditure (REE) with that predicted by formulas derived from populations with normal weight or obesity and from women with severe and morbid obesity. Material and methods: 66 women (aged 35.6 +/- 10.3 y and BMI of 44.7 +/- 4.9 kg/m(2)) were evaluated by indirect calorimetry with a metabolic monitor Deltatrac (Datex Inst., Finland), before undergoing gastric bypass. REE was calculated with the following equations: Harris-Benedict's with both actual and adjusted weight, Ireton-Jones', Mifflin's, and Carrasco's Fast Estimation, which corresponds to 16.2 kcal x kg actual weight. Results: (mean +/- sd). Measured REE was 1797 +/- 239 kcal/day. All formulas, except Harris-Benedict's with adjusted weight, overestimated REE. The Ireton-Jones' equation presented the greater overestimation (689 329 kcal/day), whereas Mifflin's equation overestimated REE only by 6 202 kcal/day. No significant differences were detected between measured and calculated REE by Mifflin's and Carrasco's Fast Estimation. Accuracy (defined as difference between calculated and measured REE within +/- 10%) was greater with Mifflin's equation (68%), followed by Harris-Benedict's with actual weight (64%) and Carrasco's Fast Estimation (61%). By using the Bland-Altman analysis, significant correlations were observed between calculated-measured REE and mean REE (calculated + measured/2) with all equations except Carrasco's Fast Estimation. This means that all but one formula underestimate or overestimate REE depending on the level of measured REE. Conclusion: In severe and morbid obese women, Mifflin's and Carrasco's Fast Estimation equations provided the best performance to estimate REE. Before recommending an equation in an a subset of individuals it is necessary to make previous validation studies mine that equation with the best predictive power for this particular group of patients.es_CL
Lenguagedc.language.isoeses_CL
Keywordsdc.subjectresting energy expenditurees_CL
Area Temáticadc.subject.otherNutrition & Dieteticses_CL
Títulodc.titleConcordancia entre gasto energético y reposo medido y estimado por fórmulas predictivas en mujeres con obesidad severa y mórbidaes_CL
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record