Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorVöhringer Cárdenas, Paul Alfred 
Authordc.contributor.authorJiménez, M. I. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorIgor, M. A. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorForés, G. A. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorCorrea, M. O. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorSullivan, M. C. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorHoltzman, N. S. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorWhitham, E. A. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorBarroilhet, Sergio es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorAlvear, K. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorLogvinenko, T. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorKent, D. M. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorGhaemi, S. N. 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2014-01-06T14:38:44Z
Available datedc.date.available2014-01-06T14:38:44Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2013
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Affective Disorders 151 (2013) 1125–1131en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/129091
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground: Despite availability of validated screening tests for mood disorders, busy general practitioners (GPs) often lack the time to use them routinely.This study aimed to develop asimplified clinical predictive score to help screen for presence of current mood disorder in low-income primary care settings. Methods: In across-sectionalstudy, 197 patients seen at 10 primary care centers in Santiago, Chile completed self-administered screening tolos for mood disorders: the Patient Health question naire (PHQ-9) and the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ).To determine participants’ current-point mood disorder status,trained clinicians applied agold-standard diagnostic interview (SCID-I).Asimplified clinical predictive model (CM) was developed based on clinical feature sand selected questions from the screening tools.Using CM, a clinical predictive score (PS) was developed. Full PHQ – 9 and GP assessment were compared with PS. Results: Using multivariate logistic regression, clinical and demographic variables predictive of current mood disorder were identified for asimplified 8-point predictive score (PS). PS had better discrimination than GP assessment (auROC-statistic¼0.80 [95%CI0.72,0.85] vs. 0.58 [95%CI0.52,0.62] p-value o0.0001), but not as good as the full PHQ-9 (0.89 [95%CI0.85,0.93], p-value ¼ 0.03). Compared with GP assessment, PS increased sensitivity by 50% ata fixed specificity of 90%. Administered in a typical primary care clinical population, itcorrectly predicted almost 80% of cases. Limitations: Further research must verify external validity of the PS. Conclusion: An easily administered clinical predictive score determined, with reasonable accuracy, the current risk of mood disorders in low-income primary care settings.en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherElsevieren_US
Keywordsdc.subjectMood disordersen_US
Títulodc.titleA clinical predictive score for mood disorder riskin low-income primary care settingsen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record