Development of the Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders (STROND) checklist A guideline for the reporting of incidence and prevalence studies in neuroepidemiology
Artículo
Open/ Download
Publication date
2015Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Bennett, Derrick A.
Cómo citar
Development of the Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders (STROND) checklist A guideline for the reporting of incidence and prevalence studies in neuroepidemiology
Author
- Bennett, Derrick A.;
- Brayne, Carol;
- Feigin, Valery L.;
- Barker Collo, Suzanne;
- Brainin, Michael;
- Davis, Daniel;
- Gallo, Valentina;
- Jette, Nathalie;
- Karch, Andre;
- Kurtzke, John F.;
- Lavados Germain, Pablo Manuel;
- Logroscino, Giancarlo;
- Nagel, Gabriele;
- Preux, Pierre-Marie;
- Rothwell, Peter M.;
- Svenson, Lawrence W.;
Abstract
Background: Incidence and prevalence studies of neurologic disorders play an important role in assessing the burden of disease and planning services. However, the assessment of disease estimates is hindered by problems in reporting for such studies. Despite a growth in published reports, existing guidelines relate to analytical rather than descriptive epidemiologic studies. There are also no user-friendly tools (e.g., checklists) available for authors, editors, and peer reviewers to facilitate best practice in reporting of descriptive epidemiologic studies for most neurologic disorders.
Objective: The Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders (STROND) is a guideline that consists of recommendations and a checklist to facilitate better reporting of published incidence and prevalence studies of neurologic disorders.
Methods: A review of previously developed guidance was used to produce a list of items required for incidence and prevalence studies in neurology. A 3-round Delphi technique was used to identify the "basic minimum items" important for reporting, as well as some additional "ideal reporting items." An e-consultation process was then used in order to gauge opinion by external neuro-epidemiologic experts on the appropriateness of the items included in the checklist.
Findings: Of 38 candidate items, 15 items and accompanying recommendations were developed along with a user-friendly checklist.
Conclusions: The introduction and use of the STROND checklist should lead to more consistent, transparent, and contextualized reporting of descriptive neuroepidemiologic studies resulting in more applicable and comparable findings and ultimately support better health care decisions.
General note
Artículo de publicación ISI
Identifier
URI: https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/138238
Quote Item
Neurology® 2015;85:821–828
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item: