Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorConcha Miranda, Miguel 
Authordc.contributor.authorMore de la Cruz, Jamileth 
Authordc.contributor.authorGrinspun Siguelnitzky, Noemi 
Authordc.contributor.authorSánchez, Cristian 
Authordc.contributor.authorPaula-Lima, Andrea 
Authordc.contributor.authorVáldes Guerrero, José Luis 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2020-05-18T22:14:18Z
Available datedc.date.available2020-05-18T22:14:18Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2020
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationBehavioural Brain Research 385 (2020) 112555es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112555
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/174811
Abstractdc.description.abstractDuring spatial navigation, some typical parameters of learning have been observed, such as latency or path length. However, these parameters are sensitive to patterns of navigation and orientation that are not easily measurable. In the present study, we used a modified version of the Oasis maze and evaluated different parameters of learning, navigation, and orientation in different animal groups. Through a PCA (Principal component analysis) we found different factors such as learning, navigation, speediness, anxiety, orientation, path variability, and turning behavior. Each factor gathers different groups of behavioral variables. ANOVA analysis of those factors demonstrates that some of them are more strongly modulated by trial progression, while others by animal group differences, indicating that each group of variables is better reflecting one of these dimensions. To understand the nature of these navigation differences, we studied orientation strategies between animal conditions and across trials. We found that the main navigational strategy used by the animals consist of locating the target and directing their behaviors towards this area. When testing how this strategy changed after cognitive impairment or enhancement, we found that A beta Os treated animals (Amyloid beta Oligomers, Alzheimer animal model) have strong orientation difficulties at locating the target at longer distances. While animals with learning enhancement (exercised rat) do not show changes in orientation behaviors. These analyses highlight that experimental manipulations affect learning, but also induced changes in the navigational strategies. We concluded that both dimensions can explain the differences observed in typical learning variables, such as latency or path length, motivating the development of new tools that asses this two-dimension as a separate but, interacting phenomenon.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipInstituto Milenio, Biomedical Neuroscience Institute, BNI, Chile ICM P09-015F Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico (Fondecyt), Ph.D. Conicyt fellowship, Chile 21150176 Guillermo Puelma Foundation, Chilees_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherElsevieres_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceBehavioural Brain Researches_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectSpatial learninges_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectNavigationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectOrientationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectHippocampuses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPCA analysises_ES
Títulodc.titleDifferential navigational strategies during spatial learning in a new modified version of the Oasis mazees_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso Abierto
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorapces_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISI
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile