Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorNegrín, Roberto 
Authordc.contributor.authorFerrer, Gonzalo 
Authordc.contributor.authorIñiguez, Magaly 
Authordc.contributor.authorDuboy, Jaime 
Authordc.contributor.authorSaavedra, Manuel 
Authordc.contributor.authorReyes Larraín, Nicolás 
Authordc.contributor.authorJabes, Nicolás 
Authordc.contributor.authorBarahona Vásquez, Maximiliano 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2021-04-08T15:31:05Z
Available datedc.date.available2021-04-08T15:31:05Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2021
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Robotic Surgery · October 2020es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1007/s11701-020-01162-8
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/179018
Abstractdc.description.abstractThere is a high prevalence of knee osteoarthritis that affects only the medial tibiofemoral compartment. In this group of patients with severe disease, the medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an excellent choice. However, this technique has a great learning curve due to the lower tolerance of improper positioning and alignment. In this context, the robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) arises as an option to improve the accuracy and secondarily enhance the clinical outcomes related to the UKA. The objective in this study is to determine if there are significant advantages with the use of RAS over conventional surgery (CS). In the systematic review of the literature, classification of the results in three main subjects: (A) precision and alignment; (B) functional results and clinical parameters; (C) survivorship. We found 272 studies, of which 15 meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. There is mostly described that RAS significantly improves the accuracy in position (80-100% of planned versus performed P < 0.05), alignment (2-3 times less error variance P < 0.05) and selection of the proper size of the implants (69.23% of correct size femoral implants versus 16.67% using CS P < 0.0154). Recently, there is mild evidence about benefits in the early rehabilitation and post-operative pain, but in all studies reviewed, there is no advantages of RAS in the long-term functional evaluation. There is no strong literature that supports a longer survival of the prothesis with RAS, being the longest mean follow-up reported of 29.6 months. RAS is a useful tool in increasing the precision of the medial UKA implant placement. However, there is still a lack of evidence that properly correlates this improvement in accuracy with better clinical, functional and survival results.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherSpringeres_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceJournal of Robotic Surgeryes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectRobotic-assisted surgeryes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectRobotic surgeryes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectRoboticses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectUnicompartmental knee arthroplastyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectUnicondylar kneees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectKneees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectArthroplastyes_ES
Títulodc.titleRobotic-assisted surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does it improve the precision of the surgery and its clinical outcomes? Systematic reviewes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcrbes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile