Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorIbáñez Bruron, María Carolina
Authordc.contributor.authorCruzat Corssen, Andrea
Authordc.contributor.authorÓrdenes Cavieres, Gonzalo
Authordc.contributor.authorCoria, Marcelo
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2022-12-26T20:00:05Z
Available datedc.date.available2022-12-26T20:00:05Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2021
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationRev Med Chile 2021; 149: 493-500es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.issn0034-9887
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/190032
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground: The early detection of retinopathy among diabetics is of utmost importance. Aim: To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of two diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening strategies currently used in the Chilean public health system. Material and Methods: Cross-sectional observational study of 371 diabetic patients aged 61 ± 14 years (61% women) who underwent DR screening at a public Hospital between July 1 and August 31, 2019. The mydriatic retinal photographs of all participants were classified using artificial intelligence software (DART) and trained medical technologists, independently. The precision of both strategies was compared with the reference standard, namely the evaluation of the fundus by an ophthalmologist with a slit lamp. Participants with severe non-proliferative DR or worse were considered as positive cases. The ophthalmologist was blind to the results of the screening tests. Results: Twenty four percent of participants had DR, including 34 (9.2%) who had sight threatening DR in at least one eye. The sensitivity and specificity of DART were 100% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 90-100%) and 55,4% (95% CI: 50-61%), respectively. Medical technologists had a sensitivity of 97,1% (95% CI: 85-100%) and a specificity of 91,7% (95% CI: 88-94%). The only case missed by medical technologists was a patient with unilateral panphotocoagulated DR. Conclusions: Both strategies had a similar sensitivity to detect cases of sight-threatening DR. However, the specificity of DART was significantly lower compared to medical technologists, which would greatly increase the burden on the health system, a very important aspect to consider in a screening strategy.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoeses_ES
Publisherdc.publisherSociedad Médica de Santiagoes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
Sourcedc.sourceRevista Médica de Chilees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectArtificial intelligencees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectDiabetic retinopathyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMass screeninges_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPublic healthes_ES
Títulodc.titleExactitud de tamizaje de retinopatía diabética: inteligencia artificial versus tecnólogos médicos entrenadoses_ES
Title in another languagedc.title.alternativeAccuracy of artificial intelligence compared to trained medical technologists in diabetic retinopathy screeninges_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dc.description.versiondc.description.versionVersión publicada - versión final del editores_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcfres_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publícación WoSes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUSes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCIELOes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States