Isolation of Viable Porcine Islets by Selective Osmotic Shock Without Enzymatic Digestion
Artículo
Open/ Download
Publication date
2010Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Atwater Ransom, Illani
Cómo citar
Isolation of Viable Porcine Islets by Selective Osmotic Shock Without Enzymatic Digestion
Author
Abstract
Islet transplantation is a potential cure for type 1 diabetes, but clinical results have been
disappointing. Currently, islet isolation is by enzymatic digestion of the pancreas which has
significant pitfalls: warm ischemia exposure, collagenase-induced damage to the islet mass and
viability, poor reproducibility, high cost, a relatively low number of islets obtained per whole
pancreas, and selection of islets for collagenase resistance rather than for glucose responsiveness.
In the present study we performed a series of experiments in a porcine model to
demonstrate the feasibility of a new isolation method based on selective osmotic shock (SOS)
using very high glucose solutions, doubling or tripling physiological osmotic strength. The SOS
method can be carried out at room temperature or in the cold eliminating warm ischemia time
which damages the islets. The SOS method does not depend on the texture of the pancreas so
all pancreases can be processed identically and the process can be fully automated. The SOS
method isolates all the islets of the pancreas regardless of size and shape allowing a greater
number of islets to be harvested. The SOS method avoids exposure to toxins in collagenase
solutions, is inexpensive and selects for islets with high concentrations of Glut 2 transporters,
representing the best glucose responding islets. The SOS method showed a comparable
recovery of islets from young pig pancreas and the islets showed improved viability. We
conclude that the selective osmotic shock (SOS) method of separating islets from the
pancreatic tissue is superior to the collagenase method.
Identifier
URI: https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/128550
DOI: doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.11.030
Quote Item
Transplantation Proceedings, 42, 381–386 (2010)
Collections